01
The decision map
How this person appears to process evidence, pressure, uncertainty, status, and disagreement — separated into observation, framework inference, and analyst judgment.
The Counterparty Decision Sprint is a 48-hour, evidence-led brief for a founder facing one consequential person and one live decision. A human analyst builds it from public and client-approved material; software supports the work, but does not make the call.
What you receive
The work is anchored to a named situation, objective, set of stakes, and time horizon. Every consequential claim is labelled by what supports it. Forecasts are conditional, never guarantees.
01
How this person appears to process evidence, pressure, uncertainty, status, and disagreement — separated into observation, framework inference, and analyst judgment.
02
Conditional branches for the live decision: what may cause movement, delay, resistance, or reversal; what signals would strengthen or weaken each branch; and the confidence attached to each call.
03
A concrete meeting and message plan: what to lead with, what to prove, what to avoid, which questions to ask, and how to recognise a real yes versus polite deferral.
04
A private 60-minute working session after delivery. We challenge the read, rehearse the consequential conversation, and leave with the next moves written down.
Use it when
What this is — and is not
This sprint is delivered by Mahakram Labs, the analyst-operated service. The public website handles the offer and booking. It is not the Mahakram self-serve WebApp, and it is not an autonomous Sengo deployment.
It does not diagnose mental health, infer protected or sensitive traits, run covert access, or promise that a person will behave in a particular way. It uses lawful public material and evidence you are authorised to share.
If the fit call shows that the evidence is too thin, the decision is too low-stakes, or the requested use crosses those boundaries, the sprint is declined before payment.
One founding-pilot slot
Fit takes fifteen minutes. We define the question, confirm lawful evidence, and decide whether the sprint can materially change what you do next.